Talk:2002-06-16-Universal Father, Cosmic Connections

Rob wrote: Friday, August 30, 2013 at 4:02PM

Hello Gerdean-

In this lesson, in the fourth paragraph before the dialogue section begins the word Himselves appears in this paragraph

That may seem like an impossible challenge, and yet it is entirely possible for you to know the Father and to feel such affinity with Him, that He will enable you to represent Him in the world as you pass by, much as He has manifested Himselves in the lives of other great and humble men and women of God.

Are you certain the word Himselves is what is intended? While I can see its merit, it is awkward.

Then again, in the seventh paragraph from the bottom of the dialogue section before the section 3.3.1 The Teachers begins, its last sentence is incomplete. I did check your edited version, but this lesson seems to be missing.

Having a knowledge of the spirit influences as extensions of divinity, as appropriate and divinely decreed orders of beings who administrate and minister to the worlds of time and space, as seraphim and other entities do and have done since the beginning of the universe, often you forget yourself. Although most of you live quiet lives, unaware of how much the Father does indeed penetrate into the lives of the material beings, how much His influence prevails in the material world, you are occasionally made aware of another level of reality. A door of perception will open affording you a peek of a

Of course, the record stands on its own merit regardless of any errors, but I wanted to double check with you on the above.

Gratefully,

Rob--rdavis 21:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Gerdean wrote: Friday, August 30, 2013 at 6:02PM

(1) Should be Himself.

(2) This is what I've got in my files, too, which is obviously incomplete. I would recommend you close it out with a period after peek.

Thanks.--rdavis 23:48, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Rob wrote: Friday, August 30, 2013 at 6:49PM

Thanks Gerdean! The changes have been made and the correspondence added to the discussion page for future reference. --rdavis 23:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)