Talk:2011-08-28-N. Idaho TeaM

Hello Tom!

Good to hear from you as ever. I always like to defer to the source of any writing, but as you discern, I will from time to time offer my opinions when I sense a different meaning is intended. Having heard from you regarding Henry's suggestion, I will add it to the record as suggested and enclose this correspondence in the discussion page for the record. Changing other public records is something that only you and the group can know best whether to implement, but I think it's best for public records to mirror one another if possible.

Gratefully,

Rob--rdavis 20:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

From: Tom Newbill <t.oldbill@gmail.com> Date: September 15, 2011 2:33:20 PM CDT Hi Rob...thanks for your comments and keen eye. I spoke with Henry just now and he said to add the "or materialization" marked in red if you wish..does this make any more sense to you? If so, do you think I should notify Ron Besser to add this change for the archives? Thanks.....Tom

On Sep 14, 2011, at 9:45 PM, Rob Davis wrote:

Hello Tom-

Thank you and everyone in the No. Idaho TeaM for this. While I was making the record for this lesson, I was led to question the phrase in this section - "the spiritual presence [or materialization] of spiritual beings on your planet has not been finalized". The question I have is whether the reference to "spiritual presence" (of spiritual beings) might not be referring instead to 'material' presence of spiritual beings in light of the context.

Can you verify?

Thanks,

Rob--rdavis 20:20, 15 September 2011 (UTC)